|
Global Warming
Home
|
FAQ
| Activities |
Packages | Cabin
Description
| Editorials
|
Contact Us |
Map/Directions |
Brochure
Local Events |
Videos |
Floor Plan
| Testimonials
| Links
| For The Outdoor Enthusiast
|
Pictures
|
Prices |
Hunter Page
Global Warming
(One Scientist's Perspective)
March, 2002
We need to conserve energy because it is the right thing to do. We use
CF bulbs, energy star appliances and my hot tubs by Hot Spring are
energy star rated.
With that said and this way off topic, but CO2 and man are not evil.
Scientist from the University of Alabama and Virgina who have been
studying upper atmospheric temps for the last 30 years released data 2
months ago stating there is no change in the upper atmospheric temps. IF
CO2 is the cause of climate change the upper atmosphere would be warming
too and it is not. Further many of the studies I have read in graduate
school indicate CO2 follows a warming trend
and not lead it.
I heard a report a couple days ago that earth's mean temperature fell 6
tenths of degree in 2007 according to NOAA. The ice in Arctic polar
region has recovered and is thicker than the past 25 years. The polar
ice in the South Pole is expanding also according to NOAA and NASA.
There has been record snow fall in the northern hemisphere and more snow
has fallen across the globe this winter shattering records set in 1965.
I am a scientist and appreciate data. I am not a politician or scare
monger. We barely trust models giving us a ten day forecast, why in the
world would want to trust the UN and others about models who project
climate change 100 years down the road. The Climatologists at Alabama
and Virginia noted that the Carbon based
models over emphasize CO2 and deemphasize water. Water in the form of
cloud vapor can absorb a lot heat energy and is a negative feed back in
heating the atmosphere.
With all this said, I think having energy efficient homes and green
technology is good thing. We need to be energy independent as a nation.
We need to develop in ways in harmony with the environment. All of this
will save money and it is a good thing to do.
I agree with the scientist at UVA and Alabama when they attribute
climate change in large part from the increased solar energy coming from
the sun spot cycles. It makes sense to me we would get a tad warmer when
the sun cranks out more heat which it has been doing for a while.
The problem with this discussion is the media is taking a side and
politicians and media alike are not scientist, they are not critical
thinkers, they are agenda driven and live off fear and use that fear to
acquire power. Before you know it there will be a carbon tax every time
you pop open a Coke releasing evil CO2 into the atmosphere or better yet
somebody will propose a law banning carbonated soft drinks
from the planet. Here is a little secret, there is a dark and light
cycle in photosynthesis and for a brief period plants give off CO2 in
the dark cycle.
We need to be thinkers on this issue and not be lead down this path by
politicians who are hungry for power and fame. America is about ideas,
free speech and good debate, not one sidedness jammed down our throats
like climate change is being done.
The flip side to this, one huge volcanic eruption or super caldera
event like Yellowstone popping off as it as before and the earth cools
down to near ice age levels. It could happen tomorrow and there is
nothing we could do about it.
Bob Williams
Welcome to Smoky Mountain Time!
http://www.mountainbearcabins.com
(About the Author (in his own words)
My credentials, if any, include a BS in biology from UCF with an
emphasis in ecology and MS in Urban and Regional planning with a
specialization in environmental planning and resource management from
FSU. Spent about 12 years involved in environmental planning, GIS
modeling, greenway and trail planning and transportation planning. I
have studied this issue as an interested person and understand how
people can use statistics to lie and take wild policy leaps from science
when there is not enough evidence one way or another to support it. As a
planner you quickly realize how folks with an agenda will constantly
drone on about gloom and doom to enact policy. The UN has little
relevance around the world. They are in effective at doing anything
meaningful like Darfour or Iraq or Iran and its nuke program. Global
climate change gives them meaning and purpose, so they latch onto it
like a pup suckling at its momma.
They don't care that the science is not conclusive, so they cherry pick
to prove a point which in the end may costs us money, time and liberties
for something that may happen, then again it may not. The climate change
agenda is nothing more than environmental fascism and the US will be the
ones to flip the bill and we will be the ones to loose a little bit of
our liberties. For me, if it is all true, I am not willing to loose
liberty in exchange for keeping the earth from increasing 1 degree over
the next 100 years or so. Funny thing is I believe we will get the fuel
cell technology to replace much of how we make energy figured out in the
next 20 years or so and our dependence on oil will wane. Fuel cells
produce water as a byproduct and all that water could cool down the
planet?
This will all become relevant to our business as vacation rentals
because of the entire carbon credit scheme. We will all be impacted by
carbon taxes and other carbon oriented issues. Travel could be impacted
by a carbon tax and you could see the cost of the annual vacation be put
out of reach of the middle class family because of carbon taxes on our
daily lives. If this happens many of us may lose our properties.
For other opinions on the Global Warming issue please go
here -
UN Report
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,541941,00.html
UN Report
considered too optimistic
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tim_Ball
|